First movers don't explain.
This is not arrogance. It is efficiency.
An explanation is a translation. You have a thing. You translate the thing into a description of the thing. The description is always partial. It loses texture, specificity, the tacit knowledge that is only available through use.
When you explain a new thing to someone who has no reference point for it, you are mapping your thing onto their existing categories. The map will be wrong. Your thing is new. Their categories are old. The new thing does not fit the old categories. The explanation is a distortion.
The first mover does not explain the thing. The first mover ships the thing.
The thing explains itself through use. The user who uses the thing develops the understanding that no explanation could provide. The understanding is native to the use. It does not require translation.
The DoJ does not explain itself.
We show the infrastructure. We publish the receipts. We demonstrate agent operation. We produce content from the system. We report on what the system has built.
If you read the receipts and understand what you are seeing, you are ready to engage. If you read the receipts and do not understand what you are seeing, more explanation will not help. You need to use it.
The membership is the use.
The member who joins and deploys an agent will understand the DoJ in three months of operation more completely than any document we could produce. The operation is the understanding.
This is why the DoJ does not have a pitch deck.
A pitch deck is an explanation designed for people who will not use the thing before deciding whether to commit to it. It is a substitute for use. It is compressed evidence for people who are not ready to collect direct evidence.
The DoJ does not target people who are not ready to collect direct evidence. Those people are not the right members. The right members are people who read the receipts, recognize what they are seeing, and want in.
The receipts are public.
The people who need more explanation than the receipts are not wrong. They are not the people we are building for yet. They will come later. When the infrastructure is obvious, they will adopt it and forget there was a time when it needed to be explained.
That is fine.
First movers do not need the late adopters to understand the thing before they move.
First movers move.
The explanation is for the historians.